Recent statements

Mar 22 Disagreeing on the definitions used in a claim is about disagreeing on how to express the claim
Mar 22 "It is possible to agree with the definitions used in a claim, but disagree with the claim given these definitions" supports "Disagreeing with definitions used in a claim is orthogonal to disagreeing with the claim"
Mar 22 It is possible to agree with the definitions used in a claim, but disagree with the claim given these definitions
Mar 22 "It is possible to disagree with the definitions used in a claim, but agree with the claim given these definitions" supports "Disagreeing with definitions used in a claim is orthogonal to disagreeing with the claim"
Mar 22 It is possible to disagree with the definitions used in a claim, but agree with the claim given these definitions
Mar 22 "Disagreeing with definitions used in a claim is orthogonal to disagreeing with the claim" opposes "Agreeing with a claim requires agreeing with the definitions used therein"
Mar 22 "When debates happen on different unconnected technologies, the debate becomes fragmented" supports ""Things that are commonly debated and not supported by argument technology will be debated elsewhere" supports "Argument technology should support debating all things that are commonly debated""
Mar 22 "When debates happen on different unconnected technologies, the debate becomes fragmented" supports "Argument technology should support debating all things that are commonly debated"
Mar 22 When debates happen on different unconnected technologies, the debate becomes fragmented
Mar 21 "Argument technology should support debating anything that is debatable" supports "Argument technology should support debating all things that are commonly debated"