Socratrees

  • Recent
  • Info
  • Sign up for beta
  • Log in

Systems research is reviewed unfairly compared to other types of contributions in Human-Computer Interaction

1
6
posted Dec 13, 2018
http://dubfuture.blogspot.com/2009/11/i-give-up-on-chiuist.html?m=1 – Whathecode Dec 17, 2018 10:08

Supporting

1
  • It is much harder to get a system paper accepted at HCI conferences than other types of contributions
    1
    5
    1
    1
  • Many reviewers at HCI conferences do not value the difficulty of building real systems
    1
    4
    1
    0
  • Many reviewers at HCI conferences do not value the difficulty of running studies on real systems for real tasks
    1
    3
    1
    0
  • Systems research can be valid Human-Computer Interaction contributions
    1
    0
    1
    0
  • Social science researchers are often the most available reviewers for a systems paper on a social computing topic
    1
    0
    1
    0

Opposing

0
  • Different types of contributions are as likely to receive unfair reviews at HCI conferences
    0
    1
    1
    0

Current branch

Loading ...

Used in

This statement supports:

  • It is extremely difficult to get a single system paper published as first author at CHI or UIST over the course of a PhD
  • It is much harder to get a system paper accepted at HCI conferences than other types of contributions

The inverse is not used.